Skip to content
Citizens Transparency Institute

Find the record. Test the claim. Know what is held about you.

Public beta · Reviewed 15 Aug 2026
Institution Due Diligence

Verify the institution, the authority, the money, and the record.

A public-interest due-diligence method joining legal identity, governance, public money, property, litigation, regulation, audits, web history, and responsible officials without confusing warning signs with proof.

CTI public guideReviewed 15 Aug 2026Browser-local tools

Use this when

  • Evaluating a government body, contractor, nonprofit, company, landlord entity, campaign organization, or public-private partnership.
  • Testing claims about authority, ownership, spending, performance, conflicts, or enforcement history.
  • Preparing an interview, records request, partnership decision, or accountability report.

Do not use this for

  • Declaring misconduct from a single filing, lawsuit, address, donation, or association.
  • Beneficial-ownership or identity claims unsupported by reliable records.
  • Private-person targeting unrelated to institutional accountability.
Before you begin

Prepare the file before you search.

  • Exact legal and operating names
  • Jurisdiction and registration identifiers
  • Claim and review period
  • Programs, contracts, awards, and properties
  • Known officers and responsible officials
  • Source map and contradiction log
  • Right-of-reply plan
End-to-end method
  1. 01

    Resolve legal identity

    Record legal name, assumed names, entity number, formation jurisdiction, status, registered agent, addresses, parent/subsidiary relationships, and effective dates.

  2. 02

    Map governance and authority

    Identify officers, directors, governing body, authorizing statute, licenses, tax-exempt status, delegations, and officials responsible during the period.

  3. 03

    Trace public money

    Join appropriations, solicitations, bids, scoring, contracts, amendments, grants, subawards, invoices, payment data, deliverables, and monitoring.

  4. 04

    Trace influence and assets

    Review campaign finance, lobbying, ethics disclosures, property records, deeds, liens, leases, and public-asset agreements with jurisdictional caveats.

  5. 05

    Review disputes and oversight

    Search court dockets, regulatory actions, licensing discipline, inspector-general work, audits, tax filings, council records, and documented corrective actions.

  6. 06

    Test history

    Use archived official pages and dated policies to establish what the institution represented at the relevant time; distinguish later change from earlier fact.

  7. 07

    Build the accountability matrix

    Connect claim, legal duty, appropriation, agreement, responsible party, purchased capacity, output, outcome, audit finding, response, contradiction, and unknown.

  8. 08

    Seek contrary evidence and reply

    List benign explanations, coverage gaps, name collisions, changed control, reporting lags, and superseding records. Send precise findings for response before consequential publication.

Working file

Take the method into your own case.

Generated locally in your browser. CTI does not receive the file.

Evidence standard

What good evidence looks like

  • Official registration and stable entity identifier
  • Executed instrument rather than announcement
  • Appropriation and payment records tied to the same scope and period
  • Court or regulator record with current disposition
  • Dated organizational authority and responsible official
  • A matrix distinguishing confirmed fact, inference, red flag, response, and unknown
Failure modes & escalation

Names differ across systems.

Build an alias table and match entity numbers, jurisdictions, dates, addresses, officers, and successor records before joining data.

An award appears in a spending database but not locally.

Check prime/subaward relationships, assistance versus procurement, fiscal years, recipient identifiers, amendments, and reporting lag; request the executed instrument.

A lawsuit or enforcement entry appears.

Read the docket and disposition. Filing is an allegation; settlement, dismissal, judgment, appeal, and consent order have different meanings.

A pattern looks suspicious but direct proof is absent.

Label it as a research lead or red flag, document plausible alternatives, request the missing records, and avoid asserting intent or wrongdoing.

Worked patterns

Public contractor

Verify legal entity and principals; join solicitation, bid, scoring, executed agreement, amendments, invoices, deliverables, performance reports, audits, and enforcement history.

Nonprofit grantee

Join state registration, IRS Form 990, board and key staff, grant agreement, restricted purpose, payment schedule, reported outputs, monitoring, and related-party disclosures.

Public asset disposition

Build a dated record of authority, appraisal, procurement or negotiation process, counterparties, executed agreements, deposits, contingencies, deeds, financing, amendments, and continuing obligations.

Authority desk

Official sources and specialist guides

Authority labels distinguish government sources from independent guidance. Links were reviewed 15 Aug 2026; procedures and law can change.

CTI provides public-interest research infrastructure and general information—not legal advice, a consumer-reporting service, or an investigative license.

Bay Evidence